Low Impact Foresrty

Economic Issues

Does It Pay?
Low Impact vs. High Impact


Selection Harvest
versus Clearcut

University of New Brunswick Study

 
 

A Woodlot Experiment

In 1946, the Maritime Forest Ranger School established a 10 acre study area on the UNB woodlot to compare long-term wood volume yields between clearcutting, selection cutting, and no cutting. This was mixed wood dominated by red spruce, balsam fir, hemlock, poplar and red maple. It contained trees of several age classes, about half of which were approximately 60 years old, and had a wood volume of 17 cords/acre.

The Lessons Learned

Between 1946 and 1989 the site logged selectively yielded 42 percent more wood than the clearcut area.

The value of the standing timber in the selection cut is currently greater than that now standing on the clearcut site, although it was harvested three times and the clearcut only once. The selection cut site supports twice the volume of wood growing on the clearcut site, and the value of the wood (red spruce) is considerably greater than that found on the clearcut site (poplar).

 

Control Area

Currently the area is stocked with cedar, hemlock, red spruce and red maple.

Year

Wood Volume (cords/acre)

1947

17 cords/acre

1964

28 cords/acre

1989

24 cords/acre

 

Clearcut Area

Poplar with and understory of spruce
and balsam fir now dominate the area.

Year

Volume

Harvest

1946

17 cords/acre

17 cords/acre

1977

8 cords/acre

none

1989

17 cords/acre

 

Selection Cut Area

Red Spruce dominates the site with a scattering of hemlock and red maple.

Year

Volume

Harvest

1946

17 cords/acre

12 cord/acre

1965

5 cords/acre

1989

30 cords/acre

11 cords/acre


(photos courtesy of Dale Wilson)

  N.B. Federation of Woodlot Owners Study

Does it Pay?

Where do you want to go?