Low Impact Foresrty

Economic Issues

Does It Pay?
Low Impact vs. High Impact


Selection Harvest
versus Clearcut

New Brunswick Federation of
Woodlot Owners Study

 

 

Employment and Income Advantages of Selection Harvesting on Appropriate Sites
New Brunswick Federation of Woodlot Owners Study, 1996.

In Carleton County in western New Brunswick, as in much of New Brunswick, clearcutting remains the most common approach to timber harvesting. The New Brunswick Federation of Woodlot Owners compared a number of woodlots that were being managed by a contractor using low impact forestry to surrounding forest land that was simply clearcut.

 

Compare a Clearcut to a Selectively Managed Woodlot
Clearcut Selectively managed woodlot


By leaving an intact forest, low impact forestry provides work and income from the same piece of land repeatedly over a lifetime. High impact forestry eliminates this opportunity. Below is an economic comparison of the two approaches taken in a sugar maple-yellow birch-beech forest on adjacent parcels of land in Carleton County and one nearby property.

The New Brunswick Federation of Woodlot Owners found that clearcutting in these stand represented a lost potential in employment and income. By taking the low impact approach to forestry, employment is roughly doubled over 45 years and revenue to the landowner more than doubles. This reflects not only a larger harvested volume, but increased quality of successive harvests.

 

 

Forestry Approach

High Impact

Low Impact Property A

Harvest Method

Clearcut

Selection

Regeneration

Raspberry, Poplar, 
Balsam Fir, Red Maple

Sugar Maple,
Yellow Birch, Beech

Next Harvest

2080-2100

2010-2015

Employment over 45 years

35 hours/acre

88 hours/acre

Initial Harvest

110 acres

83 acres

Volume Harvested

2,400 cords (22 cords/acre)

920 (11/acre)

Person hours

3,840 (35 hours/acre)

1,825 (22 hours/acre)

Income from first harvest

$1,960/acre

$1,137/acre

 

Forestry Approach

Low Impact Property B

Harvest Method

Selection

Regeneration

Sugar Maple, Yellow Birch, Beech

Next Harvest

2010

Employment over 45 years

60 hours/acre

Initial Harvest

60 acres

Volume Harvested

440 cords (7.3/acre)

Person hours

900 hours (15 hours/acre)

Income from first harvest

$788/acre

 

Summary of Employment and Income Created over 45 Years
through Low Impact Forestry Compared to Clearcutting

Property

Total Employment
hours/acre

Over 45 Years

Total Harvested
cords/acre

Over 45 years

Total Stumpage
$/acre to Woodlot Owner

Over 45 years (1996$)

Low Impact A
Four Harvests

88 hours/acre

40 cords/acre

$1,600/acre

Low Impact B
Four Harvests

60 hours/acre

30 cords/acre

$1,100/acre

Clearcut
One Harvest

35 hours/acre

22 cords/acre

$ 550/acre

 

  Selection Harvest versus Clearcut University of New Brunswick

Does it Pay?

Where do you want to go?